ZitatOriginal von Gio22
In dem von dir zitierten Fall wird auf die Entscheidung von 1956 verwiesen. Zur Verdeutlichung dies hier:
Sorry Gio22 die Websites die du hier gennant hast, haben nicht mit Karstens Fall zu tun. Der Fall Harden vs Recto ist eine Antwaltsgebühr Geschichte und hat nicht mit Scheidung zu tun. Der Fall Wolfgang (Deutsch) und Carmen (Filipina) ist ein Sorgerecht Geschichte. Carmen hat der "Declaration of Nullity" bei der philippinische Gericht beantragt während Wolfgang die Scheidung in Hamburg einreichte. Weil diese Scheidung in RP erkannt ist, war der "Declaration of Nullity" geschlossen/zu Ende gebracht. Nun aus der Scheidung hat Wolfgang der Sorgerecht auf die Kinder bekommen. Aber die philippinische Gericht hat es nicht anerkannt aus diesem Grund:
ZitatThe high court ruled: As a general rule, divorce decrees obtained by foreigners in other countries are recognizable in our jurisdiction, but the legal effects thereof, e.g. on the custody, care and support of the children, must be determined by our courts.
Deutsch Übersetzung:
Das allgemeine Gesetz erkennt dass Scheidungen die von Ausländer im Ausland erlangt haben, sind in unsere Gerichtsbezirk anerkannt, aber die legalische Wirkungen, zB Sorgerecht, Unterhalt der Kinder, mussen von unserem Gericht entschieden werden.
Der Schriftsteller, Albino Arriero, von Manila Standard Today hat entweder eine falsche oder nicht aktuelle Info hier gescrieben.
ZitatThe question asked by Carmen was: Can she validly remarry? The answer is YES. Section 26 of the Family Code provides: Where a marriage between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner is validly celebrated and a divorce is thereafter validly obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or her to remarry, the Filipino spouse shall likewise have the capacity to remarry under Philippine law. Considering that the divorce decree obtained by Wolfgang in Germany endows him the capacity to remarry, Carmen shall likewise have the capacity to remarry under Philippine law, it must be noted however, that Section 26 of the Family Code just quoted does not apply: 1) to a divorce obtained by a Filipino abroad from his or her Filipino spouse because said divorce decree although valid in the country where it was obtained, is considered void as far as Philippine law is concerned inasmuch as divorce is not recognized or allowed in this country, and a Filipino is governed by his natural law wherever he goes (Art. 15 Civil Code); 2) to a divorce obtained by a former Filipino who has been naturalized in another country after this naturalization, as it might open the door to rich Filipinos obtaining naturalization abroad for no other reason than to be able to divorce their Filipino spouses (Comment of Justice Alicia V. Sempio-Diy in her Handbook on the Family Code)
Former Filipinos (ehemalige Filipinos mit ausländische Staatsangehörigkeit) dürfen DOCH im Ausland sich scheiden lassen, siehe hier:
http://jlp-law.com/blog/divorce-annulment-philippines/
ZitatAlles anzeigenThe twin elements for the application of this provision are:
1. There is a valid marriage that has been celebrated between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner; and
2. A valid divorce is obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating him or her to remarry.
At first glance, Article 26 seems to apply only to a marriage between a Filipino and a foreigner. This was raised by a respected commentator in family law, Justice Sempio-Diy, who noted that Art. 26 does not apply:
to a divorce obtained by a former Filipino who had been naturalized in another country after his naturalization, as it might open the door to rich Filipinos obtaining naturalization abroad for no other reason than to be able to divorce their Filipino spouse (Handbook on the Family Code of the Philippines, 1995 Ed., p. 30).
However, this provision was later interpreted by the Supreme Court to include cases involving parties who, at the time of the celebration of the marriage were Filipino citizens, but later on, one of them becomes naturalized as a foreign citizen and obtains a divorce decree. The reckoning point is not the citizenship of the parties at the time of marriage, but their citizenship at the time a valid divorce is obtained abroad by the alien spouse capacitating the latter to remarry. (Philippines vs. Orbecido III, G.R. No. 154380, 5 October 2005).
Bitte an Philippines vs. Orbecido III, G.R. No. 154380, 5 October 2005 klicken.
and a Filipino is governed by his natural law wherever he goes (Art. 15 Civil Code);
Egal in welche Gerichtsfälle in RP man schaut, es gibt keine anerkannte Scheidung wo eine Filipina/Filipino die Scheidung eingereicht hat, kein einzige.
Gruß,
germanJoy
Die Scheidungen die von nicht Philippinos im Ausland eingereicht haben, sind die Scheidungen die ich hier meinte. Ich habe es offensichlich nicht gut erklärt. Ich entschuldige mich dafür. 
